Great Movies Revisited: What Demolition Man Can Teach Europe about How Crime Should be Fought

When police officers confront Phoenix with such puerile warnings, he humours them—only to tear through them like a wolf in a petting zoo soon after. Decades of peace have left law enforcement unprepared for real violence.

Sometimes, the most unexpected films end up being the most prescient. Blade Runner imagined a corporate-controlled, neon-lit dystopia, 2001: A Space Odyssey promised moon bases, yet neither happened. Once over-the-top satire, Demolition Man, however, feels eerily real.

Set in a sanitised, hyper-regulated future, Demolition Man follows John Spartan (Stallone), a reckless cop, and Simon Phoenix (Snipes), a one-man crime wave. Cryogenically frozen and revived in 2032, Spartan finds a society that traded security for control—while Phoenix exploits its total unpreparedness for real violence.

Europe, like Demolition Man’s San Angeles, thought it had solved violent crime. Homicide rates have plummeted—Germany’s from 2.5 per 100,000 in 1995 to 0.8 in 2022, France’s from 2.7 in 1993 to 1.6 in 2023, Italy’s from 3.4 in 1991 to 0.5 in 2022, the UK’s from 1.9 in 2002 to 1.1 in 2021.So why does it seem like it is now worse than ever?

The Drop in Violent Crime

First, it needs to be understood why violent crime dropped. Some credit better access to abortion, which prevented a generation of at-risk youth from being born in the first place. Some point to the phasing out of lead exposure which, once widely found in gasoline, has been linked to aggression.

Better intensive care units turn what would previously have been murders into “mere” assaults. The simplest answer however is that there are just fewer young men, who statistically commit most of the violent crime. As European birth rates crashed, so did its figures for violent crime.

Young men’s high testosterone levels make them more prone to taking risks, seeking position in a dominance hierarchy and, of course, acts of aggression.

A young man’s prospects matter too. One who has none has nothing to lose and all to gain from crime—when legal opportunities are scarce, breaking the law is just another way to climb the ladder.

In contrast, a middle-aged man with a family has far more to risk—prison or injury don’t just hurt him, but his loved ones as well. Crime, then, is a young man’s game because the risks are lower, and the rewards seem higher.

In addition, after the post-war baby boom, European fertility rates collapsed. With fewer young men entering society, opportunities on the labour market rose, which reduced poverty and, with it, the incentive for crime.

While Europe’s young male population is shrinking as a whole,one subgroup, that of immigrants(especially from the Middle-East and Africa), is seeing growth.

In Germany, newcomers from Syria, Iraq, and Afghanistan are overwhelmingly young and male. While native Germans have a median age of 47+, these groups are mostly in their twenties—the prime crime-committing demographic. It is a pattern which is repeated across Europe.

Immigration And Crime

Immigrants are overrepresented in European crime stats. In Germany (2018), a group making up just 2% of the population accounted for 8.5% of crimes, including 14.3% of homicides and 12.2% of sexual offenses. In Italy (2018), foreigners made up 34% of prisoners despite being 8.2% of the population, with the largest groups from Morocco, Albania, Romania, Tunisia, and Nigeria. In Denmark (2019), young adults from ethnic minority backgrounds were disproportionately involved in violent crime.

Yet despite these statistics, overall crime rates have declined—so why does it feel worse? While media saturation does amplify public anxiety, it is normal that crimes by foreigners would provoke stronger reactions, especially when linked to terrorism or sexual violence.

Many rightly feel that those who have been granted asylum should contribute to society, not hurt it. At the same time, these crimes tap into deeper anxieties about rapid demographic change, reinforcing fears that law enforcement is losing control.

The Law Enforcement Problem

At the same time, Europe’s police forces are greying. In the UK, nearly half of all officers are now over 40, up from 39.1% in 2007. In Germany, with a retirement wave on the horizon , police have lowered fitness and language standards to boost recruitment. In Sweden, 80% of officers say there simply aren’t enough boots on the ground. Fewer cops, and an aging police force contribute to a fragile sense of security.

But age isn’t the only factor. Many young immigrants come from cultures where crime is suppressed through brute force, not by perpetrators being given the metaphorical slap on the wrist. In Europe, softer policing and fear of backlash often lead to hesitation—whether against rioting youth in France or grooming gangs in the UK. Criminals feel especially emboldened when law enforcement’s resolve lessens.

Like Demolition Man’s San Angeles, Europe enjoyed a few decades of relative safety. But violence hasn’t vanished entirely—it’s adapted. And when spineless bureaucracy replaces strict enforcement of the law, a few Simon Phoenixes are enough to shatter the illusion of safety—exposing a system that’s forgotten how to show strength.

Statement

For decades, Europe enjoyed declining crime rates, but beneath the surface, cracks are forming. Aging populations and shrinking youth demographics helped reduce crime, yet one group is the exception: young and male immigrants. In countries like Germany, Italy, and Denmark, immigrants are overrepresented in violent crime statistics, fueling public fear. Meanwhile, police forces are aging, recruitment is failing, and deterrence is weakening. Fear of backlash stifles enforcement, mirroring Demolition Man’s pacified San Angeles. But crime hasn’t vanished—it has adapted. When bureaucracy replaces policing, it only takes a few Simon Phoenixes to shatter the illusion of safety.

Weekly