Weekly
The Oscars: Timeless Institution or Dusty Relic?

The Oscars: Timeless Institution or Dusty Relic?

It was Brideshead Revisited author Evelyn Waugh who in 1947, after a six-week visit, described Hollywood as a place ”where all is a continuous psalm of self-praise.” 

Fast forward to now, and it seems like nothing has really changed. Especially in recent years, the Academy Awards, otherwise known as The Oscars, served as an egregious rebuke of the virtue of humility; few events in the entertainment calendar induce as many eye-rolls.

As a result, the Oscars have become a frightful affair; a torturously long night, full of overwrought speeches, moral grandstanding and—on occasion but still all too rare— a slap more earthshaking than a cluster of Hans Zimmer bass notes. 

As ratings plummet and audiences grow weary of Hollywood’s moral posturing, one has to ask: do the Oscars still matter, or are they just an expensive soirée where the industry pats itself on the back for providing us mere mortals with ‘true art’ and, especially since the advent of Trump, for ‘being on the right side of history’? 

Responding to Trump’s America

While last night’s Oscars were more low-key concerning the latter in comparison with previous years, Adrien Brody, who won Best Actor for his role in The Brutalist, said in his acceptance speech: “If the past can teach us anything, it's a reminder to not let hate go unchecked.”—a perhaps not so veiled reference to America under a Trump presidency.

Welcome to the comments section of the Štandard daily. Please take note of our guidelines, comments are moderated by us. You can contact the moderators at support@statement.com.

Participate in the discussion

Comments are available to subscribers only. If you'd like to join the discussion, choose a subscription starting at €6.72 per month.

All comments 0

    Register

    Comments are available to registered users only. If you'd like to join the discussion, register here.