When Censorship Backfires

Efforts to suppress far-right and far-left movements in Europe have done the opposite. By portraying dissent as deviance and infantilising the electorate, centrists parties have inadvertently done their competitors’ PR for them.

The Youth’s Drift to Extremes

Recent data underscores how political preferences among Europe's youth have evolved in recent years. In France, in the 2024 European elections, the far-right National Rally (RN) secured 25% of the vote among 18–24-year-olds. In a recent 2025 IFOP survey, the data reveals a significant polarisation. The far-right National Rally (RN) leads with 32% support in this age group, while the far-left France Insoumise (LFI) garners 25%. In Germany, The Alternative for Germany (AfD) party garnered substantial support from young voters. In the 2024 local elections, exit polls indicated that the AfD received 31% of the vote among the youth in both Saxony and Brandenburg, and 38% in Thuringia. In Poland, The radical right Confederation party won approximately 30% of the youth vote, reflecting a broader trend of young voters seeking alternatives to traditional parties.

Social media has played a pivotal role in this, as it has become the main place where the youth come into contact with and debate political alternatives. Here, algorithms play a decisive role in the creation of echo chambers for young users. Platforms like TikTok and YouTube are instrumental in disseminating radical content, often under the guise of satire or memes. If we take the AfD as an example, that party’s use of these platforms has resonated with a younger demographic, which is increasingly disillusioned with mainstream media and politics.

Attempts to censor or suppress far-right ideologies have only backfired, inadvertently increasing their allure. For example, in Germany, the government's labeling of certain AfD regional chapters as extremist has not decreased the support it enjoys among the youth; instead, it has fueled the perception of the party as one challenging the status quo—voting for it thus makes you a rebel, which youths tend to want to be.

Indeed, centrist parties are increasingly being perceived as being out of touch. The now popular—and dismissive— expression “Okay, boomer” exemplifies a youth rejecting the traditional order and finding value in radical movements. The European Council on Foreign Relations reports a growing sentiment that the EU is “too white,” “too western,” and “too boomer,” indicative of feelings of exclusion and disillusionment. This reflects both a positive reception among youth of rhetoric found on the left and a growing sentiment on the right that the “boomer order” must come to an end.

The Political Implications of Censorship

In Germany, which has stringent laws on speech, a recent case involved radical right-wing journalist David Bendels, who received a—now suspended—seven-month sentence for having mocked Interior Minister Nancy Faeser. The ruling sparked outrage across the political spectrum, with critics arguing that such laws restrict freedom of expression and give politicians disproportionate power to suppress dissent. Human rights groups and journalists from even foreign publications like The Times to The Economist, have voiced similar concerns.

These measures, while designed to curb extremism, often encourage its growth. The paradox is hard to miss: censorship, bans, and moral grandstanding may delegitimise radical voices in elite circles. Yet, in the eyes of the common person, these radicals are rebels, with all the allure that comes with that status. It’s the classic case of the Streisand effect. For many, especially younger voters, radicalism simply doesn’t pose a threat: it’s the only language left to them to shake up a tired consensus.

After decades of a managerial class promoting centrism, the public mood is shifting. A 2024 YouGov survey showed that 58% of Europeans aged 18–34 believe their political system is “rigged” against ordinary people. An inability to address this generational fatigue—as many are disillusioned with globalism, while frustrated with stagnant wages and cultural friction in their societies—has created a vacuum.

In step the radicals; not necessarily because they have the best answers, but because they dare to ask the forbidden questions. Youth-driven wings of radical parties are not anomalies but symptoms of widespread weariness.

Charting the Future

If current trends persist, the political landscape may witness continued polarisation, with radical ideologies making further inroads among the youth. The suppression of dissenting voices risks alienating young voters, driving them towards movements that position themselves as defenders of free expression.

Centrist parties must therefore reevaluate their strategies, move beyond censorship and engage authentically with the concerns of younger generations. This involves fostering open dialogue, addressing socioeconomic disparities, and embracing inclusive policies that resonate with the experiences and aspirations of the youth.

Failure to do so may result in the continued decline of centrism, leaving a political arena dominated by the extremes. To safeguard democratic principles and ensure a balanced political discourse, it is imperative to address the root causes of disillusionment and create avenues for meaningful engagement.

Statement

Censorship, while intended to protect democratic values, may inadvertently undermine them while fueling the very extremism it seeks to suppress. To counter the rise of radical ideologies among Europe's youth, centrist parties must prioritise authentic engagement, address underlying grievances, and uphold the principles of open discourse and pluralism.

Weekly