Political assassination is one of the most direct assaults on democracy. Yet it does not manifest in the same way across societies. A comparison between Europe and the United States reveals two distinct “assassination cultures”. America has long been the land of the lone gunman, where individuals step forward to alter history by pulling a trigger. Europe, by contrast, produced underground armies: disciplined, conspiratorial cells that waged war on the state through carefully planned kidnappings and murders.
In the United States the assassin is almost always alone. John Wilkes Booth, who shot Abraham Lincoln in 1865, fancied himself a heroic avenger of the Confederacy. Charles Guiteau, who killed President James Garfield in 1881, was a delusional office-seeker who believed God had commanded him to act. Leon Czolgosz, who murdered William McKinley in 1901, claimed inspiration from anarchist lectures. In the case of Lee Harvey Oswald, who felled John F. Kennedy in 1963, no organisers or backers have ever been conclusively identified.
Even failed attempts, like the shooting of Ronald Reagan in 1981, confirm the pattern. The would-be assassin of Donald Trump in Pennsylvania in 2024, too, was a solitary figure. American political culture elevates the individual; it has produced the “self-made killer”, convinced that a single bullet can redirect the course of the republic.
The material conditions support this individualisation. Firearms are abundant; the President is a highly visible target; and American mythology casts the lone avenger as a familiar archetype. Yet the deeper cause is not the availability of weapons, as Europe’s history shows.



