The retreat by BP and TotalEnergies highlights how fragile the economic foundations of Germany’s energy transition have become. Rising costs, delayed grid expansion and uncertain returns are putting growing pressure on the offshore wind sector.
TotalEnergies recently announced that it no longer intends to use parts of the offshore wind concessions it secured in the German North and Baltic Seas and is seeking to divest them. The company denies it is abandoning the German market altogether and insists it remains committed to offshore projects in the country.
At the same time, however, TotalEnergies pointed directly to what it sees as the core problem: major delays in Germany’s grid expansion plans, which are preventing electricity generated offshore from being transported efficiently to consumers. According to the company, these delays are severely undermining planning certainty.
The problem is no longer simply that turbines have become too expensive. The entire system – auctions, grid connections, financing conditions and construction costs – is falling out of balance.
TotalEnergies speaks of a strategic review, while BP talks about capital discipline. The offshore wind industry refers to “changing market conditions”. Yet behind these corporate euphemisms lies a stark reality: offshore wind, long presented as a reliable pillar of Europe’s future energy supply, is running into economic limits.
Criticism of Germany’s energy transition – including the nuclear phaseout and the planned exit from oil, gas and coal – has often been dismissed by supporters as irrational or reactionary. Yet now two of the transition’s biggest corporate champions, BP and TotalEnergies, are quietly stepping back.
A Multi-Billion-Euro Bet at Sea
The scale of the original gamble becomes clear in the numbers.
In 2023, BP and TotalEnergies won German offshore auctions covering around seven gigawatts of capacity. Their combined bids totaled €12.6bn.
What was celebrated just a few years ago as proof of the attractiveness of renewable energy now looks more like a warning sign. Billions were spent merely to obtain the right to invest further billions into turbines, foundations, cables, ships, maintenance and financing.
Such investments only make sense under stable assumptions about future profitability. Rising interest rates, higher material costs and construction inflation have since turned many projects into potentially existential risks.
Germany’s Offshore Wind Energy Association (BWO) is now calling for rules allowing companies to return awarded concessions. That is remarkable in itself. Growth industries usually demand faster permits – not exit clauses.
According to the association, around 16GW of awarded capacity could potentially be affected. Germany currently has roughly 10GW of offshore wind connected to the grid. The scale of the problem therefore exceeds the size of the existing industry.
Political Pressure Builds
Political anxiety is rising accordingly.
Environment Minister Carsten Schneider has demanded that companies honor their commitments and threatened contractual penalties. Germany’s Economy Ministry insists concessions cannot simply be handed back voluntarily.
But neither political threats nor fines can turn an uneconomic investment into a viable one. If projects no longer make financial sense under current conditions, penalties merely postpone the problem.
TotalEnergies has presented arguments that even Berlin is struggling to dismiss. Regarding the N-9.4 North Sea concession awarded in June 2025, the company pointed to major delays in grid connection schedules managed by German transmission operators.
Put simply: wind turbines built today may not be able to feed electricity into the grid for years.
Beyond the well-known issue of intermittency, offshore wind now faces additional structural weaknesses – inadequate infrastructure, rising financing costs and fading political momentum.
Developments in the United States illustrate the problem even more clearly.
America Sends a Warning
In March 2026, TotalEnergies reached agreements with the US Interior Department to return two offshore wind leases. The company simultaneously announced it would no longer develop offshore wind projects in the United States.
Its reasoning was straightforward: offshore wind power is expensive and risks making electricity less affordable for consumers. Capital would instead be redirected toward oil and gas projects.
For advocates of the energy transition, this is an uncomfortable message. It reveals where capital flows once investors begin reassessing risk and returns according to economic reality rather than political narratives.
BP is making a similar shift, albeit using softer language. The company speaks of strategic repositioning, higher returns, stronger cash flow and selective investments in the transition.
Translated from corporate management language, the meaning remains the same: offshore wind currently does not generate sufficient returns.
BP still intends to pursue certain renewable projects, but increasingly through partnerships requiring less capital exposure. This is not a total rejection of green energy. It is green energy colliding with economic reality.
Capital Does Not Follow Morality
Companies ultimately care about returns, risk and opportunity costs. Ecological visions do not pay bills.
Once gas projects, LNG terminals or traditional energy production begin offering more reliable profits, the moral prestige surrounding the energy transition quickly loses weight.
The cases of TotalEnergies and BP are therefore about far more than disputed sea concessions. They amount to a stress test for the broader green narrative that the energy transition would automatically become cheaper and easier over time.
Offshore wind increasingly suggests the opposite.
The technology itself is mature, but projects are becoming larger, more complex and vastly more capital-intensive. Unrealistic assumptions about grid connections, rising interest rates, strained supply chains, dependence on China and expensive state licensing fees are forcing even global energy giants to reach for their calculators.
Germany’s Expanding Energy Problem
For Germany, this is deeply unsettling.
Offshore wind was supposed to deliver energy security, climate protection and industrial electrification simultaneously. Yet wind power remains intermittent and incapable of providing stable baseload supply.
Meanwhile, the lack of north-south transmission lines exposes the contradictions within Germany’s expansion strategy. Plans to increase offshore wind capacity to 30GW by 2030 – and much further beyond – are already beginning to wobble.
The retreat by BP and TotalEnergies suggests this may only be the beginning.
Germany is expected to require between 22GW and 36GW of additional dispatchable power generation capacity by around 2035, but the EU’s first auction round for new gas-fired plants was capped at just 12GW.
The challenge facing the broader energy transition is even larger.
Combined together, Germany would need to add roughly 330GW to 350GW of new generation capacity over the next decade across solar, wind and controllable power plants. By 2045, net additions compared with the end of 2025 would need to reach around 460GW to 470GW.
And that calculation does not yet fully account for the rising energy demand expected from artificial intelligence, robotics and digital infrastructure – nor for the reality that renewable systems require parallel backup capacity to guarantee stable electricity supply.
Whether the retreat by BP and TotalEnergies marks merely a temporary setback or the beginning of a much broader unraveling of Germany’s energy transition remains impossible to say with certainty.