Nearly 18% of Germany’s New Asylum Applicants Were Born in Germany
Germany is celebrating falling asylum numbers and tighter borders. But 17.6% of first-time applications in early 2026 were made for children who never entered the country. They were born there.
Illustrative photo. Photo: Sean Gallup/Getty ImagesImages
Germany is celebrating its falling asylum numbers. In the first half of 2026, the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF) received only 39,646 first-time asylum applications, 35.4% fewer than in the same period last year. Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt has presented the decline as evidence that the government’s tougher migration policy, including stricter border controls and more border refusals, is working.
But another figure complicates that picture.
Of those 39,646 first-time applications, 6,962 were made for children under the age of one who were born in Germany. They accounted for 17.6% of the total. In other words, almost one in five did not represent someone newly arriving in Germany at all.
These children never crossed the German border. They were born on the German side of it.
That distinction matters because the term “first-time asylum application” can easily be understood in political debate as a proxy for new arrivals. The statistics, however, also include children born to families whose asylum cases are already unfolding inside Germany.
When an Asylum Application Begins in the Maternity Ward
Parents do not even have to file a separate asylum application for their newborn child in the conventional sense. Under Germany’s Asylum Act, they merely have to notify the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees (BAMF) of the child’s birth if at least one parent has permission to remain in Germany or continues to live in the country without a valid residence permit after their asylum proceedings have concluded.
As soon as BAMF receives notification of the birth, the child’s asylum application is automatically deemed to have been filed.
This also applies to families whose own asylum proceedings have already ended unsuccessfully. A Duldung, or tolerated stay, is not a residence permit, but a temporary suspension of deportation that must be renewed periodically.
The parents’ application may therefore have been definitively rejected while their German-born child subsequently appears in the statistics as a new first-time asylum applicant. If the child is granted asylum status, this can also affect whether the parents can be deported.
Source: German Bundestag, Printed Paper 21/7969; BAMF
Germany’s Migration Debate Has Entered a New Phase
In the first half of 2026, around 17,900 people were turned away at Germany’s borders. Border controls can still make unauthorized entry more difficult and therefore affect the number of future asylum applications. But as a response to the consequences of migration that has already taken place, they are increasingly becoming political theater.
Checkpoints, federal police officers and travelers being turned away provide highly visible images of government action and control. But they do nothing to change the fact that a significant part of Germany’s demographic transformation is now taking place within the country.
The more than 2 million people who arrived in 2015 and the years that followed have now lived in Germany for close to a decade. They are having children and putting down roots, while politics continues to focus almost exclusively on who is newly crossing the border. The 6,962 newborns show that the country has entered the next phase of its migration crisis.
What was once a question of entry has become a question of permanent settlement. Temporary accommodation has become family housing, asylum seekers have become parents and what was supposedly a temporary policy of accommodating people seeking protection has become a permanent responsibility for municipalities.
The German government can claim the decline in asylum applications as a success of its border policy. But the figures do not demonstrate a comprehensive reversal of migration. The problem is now internal as well. It concerns permanent residence, deportations and the consequences for schools, the welfare system and the labor market. Anyone who continues to point solely to falling arrival numbers is ignoring this part of the picture. Presenting border protection as an adequate answer to the migration crisis is political sleight of hand.
Welcome to the comments section of the Štandard daily. Please take note of our guidelines, comments are moderated by us. You can contact the moderators at support@statement.com.
Participate in the discussion
Comments are available to subscribers only. If you'd like to join the discussion, choose a subscription starting at €6.72 per month.
All comments 0
Register
Comments are available to registered users only. If you'd like to join the discussion, register here.