Protests in Nepal could change the constitutional order

Das höchstgelegene Land der Welt war lange Zeit eine Indien-freundliche Monarchie, wurde später jedoch von einer maoistischen Regierung übernommen.

Ein Demonstrant, der sich in die nepalesische Nationalflagge gehüllt hatte, zündete ein Regierungsfahrzeug in Mahendrapool in Pokhara, Nepal, an. Foto: Getty Images

On September 4, Nepal's radical left-wing government banned “unregistered” social networks such as Facebook and X. This led to some of the largest protests of this century, which, unlike previous protests, are being led by young adults (Generation Z).

What began as a protest against the ban on social networks has developed into violent demonstrations that even hint at a renewed change in the constitutional order.

However, Nepal's politics are determined by the influence of its two neighbors—India and China. Both superpowers deal with the former monarchy in typical superpower fashion, so the current protests are likely an expression of a weakening of Beijing's soft power, which is focused on the other side of the world.

Inspiration from India and influence from China

Until the 1940s, Nepal was a deeply traditionalist monarchy led by a king who, at a certain point, became nothing more than a “figurehead,” while all power lay with the prime ministers of the Rana dynasty. During the Indian struggle for independence, however, the social democratic Nepali Congress achieved a constitutional amendment and established a parliament.

Welcome to the comments section of the Štandard daily. Please take note of our guidelines, comments are moderated by us. You can contact the moderators at support@statement.com.

Participate in the discussion

Comments are available to subscribers only. If you'd like to join the discussion, choose a subscription starting at €6.72 per month.

All comments 0

    Register

    Comments are available to registered users only. If you'd like to join the discussion, register here.