Investing in stocks is democratic in a sense. Most people don't need a PhD in finance to buy a stake in a company they at least broadly understand. Investors can draw on their own experience, their profession, or what they use on a daily basis.
Those who work in the automotive industry can easily form an opinion about a manufacturer whose models sell well. Those who have long been dependent on certain software will naturally start to think about the company that supplies it. Stocks have one big advantage: even if you don't know all the details, the basic story is clear—the company manufactures something, sells it, and perhaps even makes a profit.
With commodities, this comfort disappears. A commodity is not a business. It has no management, cash flow, or product strategy. There are no press conferences where bosses comment on the current state of the business or the outlook for the future.
A commodity is a physical raw material embedded in logistics, storage, weather, geopolitics, and often regulation. To "understand" a commodity, one must understand how it actually gets from point A to point B and what can go wrong along the way.
Gas is not oil
With oil and gold, this barrier is lower, mainly because they are the world's best-known and most liquid commodity markets. Oil has a global infrastructure and constant attention, while gold is the archetype of a safe haven. There are a large number of comments and articles on the internet about these two commodities. Investors can therefore very quickly form an opinion for or against them.
Gas, however, is a different case. It is highly seasonal, dependent on storage and transport capacities, and its price can fluctuate so rapidly that it turns an investment into a lesson in physics and risk management. That is why, despite the seemingly simple question of whether it will be more expensive or cheaper, gas is often the supreme discipline of commodity investing.
Futures, not physical commodities
An important piece of information that may surprise novice investors is that commodity exchanges do not trade commodities in physical form, but primarily futures contracts for their future delivery.
Although these contracts are quoted in familiar units such as barrels of oil, ounces of gold, or megawatt hours of gas, we must not be misled; this is not a purchase of physical commodities. A futures contract is a financial contract that specifies the price and delivery date.
However, most investors never physically take delivery, but close the contract before expiration or roll it over to the next period.
The first pitfall for gas investors is that there is no single global gas market. This commodity is traded in several regional hubs that reflect local supply, demand, infrastructure, and politics.
The three most important benchmarks are TTF in Europe, Henry Hub in the US, and JKM in Asia. Their prices can vary significantly depending on current conditions.
Prices converge in the long term, of course. The most important market is the US market, which sells gas in dollars and in MMBtu units, i.e., Million British Thermal Units, which is a unit of energy used mainly in the US.
This market is very liquid given that the US is a major producer of natural gas. It is primarily dependent on the weather in the US, is less affected by geopolitical risks than, for example, the European market, and transport costs are not as high. As a result, this price is much more stable.
The TTF benchmark reflects the price at a virtual trading hub in the Netherlands. It is quoted in euros, so currency risk is naturally reflected in the price. The unit used is MWh. The price depends on a number of factors, in particular the state of European storage facilities, winter demand for heating, LNG imports, geopolitical risks, regulations, and the European Union's emissions policy. Investors are thus faced with the fundamental question of whether to favor the more stable US market or to try to speculate on the European market, which offers much greater volatility.
Weather as the biggest variable
However, the biggest pitfall in gas trading is the weather. In the basic equation, everything seems simple: the colder the winter, the higher the gas consumption, and vice versa, a mild winter means weaker demand. But with gas, it is not enough to watch the thermometer. The exchange does not trade physical gas, but contracts for its future delivery.
In February, for example, contracts for delivery at the end of March are commonly traded. And their price already factors in expectations of what the end of the heating season will look like, how quickly storage facilities will be depleted, and whether it will be necessary to replenish stocks for the next winter. The price therefore responds not only to the current cold spell, but above all to how the market assesses the rest of the season.
In other words, it is not a question of whether it is cold today. It is a question of whether the cold spell is greater or lesser than the market expected. Weather is a key element in pricing, but it is far from the only one. Equally important are storage capacity and the relationship between the current price and the prices of future contracts, i.e., the so-called storage and carry logic, which determines whether rolling over will add to or detract from an investor's return.
In addition, gas is traded in contracts with a high nominal value and significant volatility, so even a small price movement can have a significant impact on the result. And since it is a strategic commodity, the gas derivatives market in Europe is also subject to regulatory limits. Trading gas is therefore not for beginners or intermediate investors.
How to invest
If investors are not deterred by the complexity of the gas market, there are basically three ways to enter this commodity.
The first option is to purchase futures contracts directly. However, given the size of the contracts, this implies either high initial capital or leveraged trading. Leverage increases the risk many times over, as even a relatively small price movement can result in a significant loss. This route is therefore more suitable for experienced traders who systematically monitor the market and have a clear risk management strategy in place.
The second option is to purchase ETFs or ETCs that contain futures contracts. The initial capital here can be significantly lower, with hundreds or thousands of euros sufficient for the investor. However, the convenience of an exchange-traded product does not eliminate the risks associated with rolling contracts. If the market is in contango [the price of the futures contract is higher than the current spot price of the asset, ed.], the rolling of contracts itself can systematically erode part of the return. In addition, investors must take into account management fees and pay attention to the benchmark that the product replicates.
The third and most accessible option for most investors is to buy shares in companies operating in the gas sector. These may be gas producers such as EQT Corporation or Chesapeake Energy, integrated energy companies such as Shell with significant exposure to LNG, or infrastructure managers such as Kinder Morgan, Enbridge, or Snam.
Another group consists of companies focused on LNG processing and export, such as Cheniere Energy, Golar LNG, or Excelerate Energy.
The advantage of these companies is that they employ specialists whose daily work is to analyze the gas market, something that ordinary investors can only do to a limited extent. Many of them also pay dividends. Although their shares do not react to gas prices as directly as futures, higher commodity prices are usually reflected in better results and a greater ability to pay dividends to shareholders in the longer term.
In a sense, gas company shares can also function as a partial insurance policy. As households' heating costs rise, energy companies often benefit from more favorable pricing conditions. This is not perfect hedging, but a pragmatic way to link consumer reality with an investment portfolio.