In 2021, Sweden produced 28.4 kilograms of electronic waste per capita, but according to Eurostat data, only collected 12.9 kilograms per capita. This means that statistically, 15.5 kilograms of electronic waste were reported as not collected. In this case, Sweden would pay an annual tax of around €31 per inhabitant. With a population of around 10.5 million, this would mean around €325 million for the European coffers.
The associated administrative costs will be borne by the EU member states themselves and by the manufacturers and sellers of electronic devices operating within them.
In this context, the supply and customer chains in the electronics sector must be adapted in such a way that the proportion of uncollected electronic waste is reduced to a minimum, which means additional costs that will ultimately be borne by the end consumer. However, this will not happen before 2027 or 2028, when the measure will come into force at the earliest.
A little earlier, however, by the end of July next year at the latest, another EU regulation will come into force in the countries of the Union. This guarantees the right to repair electronic devices and other equipment. Manufacturers of electronic devices, such as mobile phones or household appliances, must be able to ensure that such devices can be repaired at a reasonable price and within a reasonable time.
At first glance, this sounds like a clear win for consumers. However, manufacturers and retailers will be faced with increased costs for the procurement of spare parts and more cost-effective repairs. At the same time, they will extend the service life of the aforementioned products at their own expense. As a result, their sales figures will deteriorate further due to the longer service life, which means additional costs.
It can therefore be assumed that the reduction in the cost and ease of repairs and the extension of the service life of products will ultimately be paid for by the end consumer. This will take the form of higher prices for new electronic devices and household appliances than they would actually be without the regulation in the form of the right to repair.
While the right to repair gives the customer something tangible in return for a higher price, namely easier and cheaper potential repairs, the tax on electronic waste will hardly be felt other than through a price increase. In return, the customer receives a completely intangible reduction in negative externalities in the form of electronic waste and its harmful effects on the environment.